As Jesus is calling his first disciples, as told in John 1, we have two instances of “come and see.”
The next day again John was standing with two of his disciples, and he looked at Jesus as he walked by and said, “Behold, the Lamb of God!” The two disciples heard him say this, and they followed Jesus. Jesus turned and saw them following and said to them, “What are you seeking?” And they said to him, “Rabbi” (which means Teacher), “where are you staying?” He said to them, “Come and you will see.” So they came and saw where he was staying, and they stayed with him that day, for it was about the tenth hour. (John 1.35 – 39, ESV)
The next day Jesus decided to go to Galilee. He found Philip and said to him, “Follow me.” Now Philip was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter. Philip found Nathanael and said to him, “We have found him of whom Moses in the Law and also the prophets wrote, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.” Nathanael said to him, “Can anything good come out of Nazareth?” Philip said to him, “Come and see.” (John 1.43 – 46, ESV)
“Come and see” is the cure for doubt and prejudice (“Can anything good come out of Nazareth?”). I experienced an amusing example of this phenomenon a couple of weeks ago.
The Wall Street Journal published an intriguing article about a leading mathematician leaving academia to work for an Artificial Intelligence (AI) company with a goal of creating a machine that can do real mathematics (discovery and proof).
I sent a mathematician friend of mine a link to it. He responded: “Thank you, Bob. Have no WSJ.”
I had sent him the “Gift article” link. Doesn’t matter that he’s not a subscriber. So I resent him the same link and said, “This link should get you the article whether you are a subscriber or not. Try it:”
I confirmed that I sent him the same link in both messages. In other words, he didn’t try the link the first time!
As with the Moylan Arrow, a “gift article” link that someone doesn’t believe in enough to click on, won’t get him to the article.
Also, he didn’t really believe the article was about real mathematics. Apparently he hadn’t heard of Ken Ono, the subject of the article. But he did know Ken Ribet, quoted in the article:
“He’s a larger-than-life figure in mathematics,” said Ken Ribet [about Ken Ono], a former president of the American Mathematical Society.
My friend wrote:
I would have thought it was a typical journalistic bubble around math, but Ken Ribet is a true and fine mathematician, who contributed to Fermat’s Last Theorem proof. I attended his talk at CC.
Finally, my friend wrote: Thanks for the article,
“Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?” “Come and see.”



